TrainWeb.org Facebook Page
Track Design (Gauging)

CONTENTS

Home

  1. Corporate Induction
  2. Railtrack Zone
  3. Electrification and Plant Appreciation
  4. Plant Maintenance
  5. Maintenance Planning
  6. Track Design
  7. Vehicle Systems Design
  8. Manufacturing
  9. Track Renewals
  10. Electrification Testing and Commisioning
  11. Electrification Design and Construction
  12. Overhead Line and Track Renewals
  13. Career Directed Experience
  14.  

  15. Links

 

Gauging

Gauging plays a key role in the design offices, this being the process of deciding whether a train can fit on the infrastructure or not.

One job that Corus have been carrying out is gauge analysis of the Leeds to Doncaster line. GNER have asked to be able to run the Eurostar on this line, and as a consequence, the line has to be both analysed and modified.

The process for analysing a route can be quite complicated. There is a piece of software called Clear Route that has the capabilities of analysing a route. The type of locomotive has to be identified. The profile of the route, gathered by surveying, is put into the software as well.

Static Profile The trains cross section when still.

Kinematic Profile

The cross section of the train whilst moving. Taking into account parameters such as suspension, velocity, wheel wear, loading etc.

Static and kinematic profiles of all kinds of trains are available, within a database. The computer can then calculate distances between the train and the surrounding infrastructure, and overlaps the profile of the train with the profile of the geography. Of course this is done for one point of the route, and a snapshot is taken at intervals, for example, every 10 m.

Fig XXX shows a cross section of a class 373/2 (Eurostar) at one end of Ardsley tunnel.

This tunnel has required lots of redesign work since GNER have requested to run class 373 locomotives. This includes changing the levels of the tracks, changing the cant, and slewing the track. To slew a set of rails means to simply move it across, either away or towards the adjacent line.

This brings into question Railtracks business plan. How have Railtrack justified the expense of remodelling the Leeds to Doncaster route just to allow an additional two trains per day? The entire ECML was redesigned and changed to allow for clearance of Class 373/2's, but these trains only run as far as York. Why don't GNER ask for them to be run all the way to Edinburgh? I feel that this shows an example of how Railtrack and the SRA need to work more closely together to ensure that the railways are being developed in the right direction.

For the West Coast mainline (WCML) Virgin have asked to be allowed to run new tilting trains. Again, this has resulted in a remodelling of the ECML to accommodate the new locomotives. These have been modelled on Clearroute for gauging purposes. The types of external factors for the kinematic envelope are slightly different for the tilting trains. That is, the cross section of the train has to be considered for three different conditions: upright, tilted and tilt failure. Tilt failure accounts for the train not self-righting after passing through a curve

Finally, this kind of gauging analysis can also be used to calculate clearances between passing trains. An example of this is seen in Fig XXX.

The minimum clearance between one train and any other object is 250 mm. This distance, however, can be less. In the case of Ardsley tunnel, the minimum design distance is 100 mm. This is simply because the tunnel cannot be moved, and very little extra space inside can be created. To get this kind of leniency on the rules is called a dispensation. This has to be agreed with all parties concerned.

For the West Coast mainline (WCML) Virgin have asked to be allowed to run new tilting trains. Again, this has resulted in a remodelling of the ECML to accommodate the new locomotives. These have been modelled on Clearroute for gauging purposes. The types of external factors for the kinematic envelope are slightly different for the tilting trains. That is, the cross section of the train has to be considered for three different conditions: upright, tilted and tilt failure. Tilt failure accounts for the train not self-righting after passing through a curve

Finally, this kind of gauging analysis can also be used to calculate clearances between passing trains. An example of this is seen in Fig XXX.

The minimum clearance between one train and any other object is 250 mm. This distance, however, can be less. In the case of Ardsley tunnel, the minimum design distance is 100 mm. This is simply because the tunnel cannot be moved, and very little extra space inside can be created. To get this kind of leniency on the rules is called a dispensation. This has to be agreed with all parties concerned.